ambossIconambossIcon

Neutropenic fever

Last updated: September 15, 2025

CME information and disclosurestoggle arrow icon

To see contributor disclosures related to this article, hover over this reference: [1]

Physicians may earn CME/MOC credit by searching for an answer to a clinical question on our platform, reading content in this article that addresses that question, and completing an evaluation in which they report the question and the impact of what has been learned on clinical practice.

AMBOSS designates this Internet point-of-care activity for a maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

For answers to questions about AMBOSS CME, including how to redeem CME/MOC credit, see “Tips and Links” at the bottom of this article.

Icon of a lock

Register or log in , in order to read the full article.

Quick guidetoggle arrow icon

Diagnostic approach

Avoid performing rectal examination or measuring rectal temperature due to the risk for bacteremia.

Diagnostic criteria

  • ANC < 500 cells/mm3 (or expected to decrease to < 500 mm3 within 48 hours)
  • Fever ≥ 38°C for ≥ 1 hour or ≥ 38.3°C once

Red flag features

Management checklist

Neutropenic fever is an emergency. A delay in antibiotic therapy increases the mortality risk.

Icon of a lock

Register or log in , in order to read the full article.

Summarytoggle arrow icon

Neutropenic fever is an oncologic emergency common in patients receiving chemotherapy. A decrease in a patient's absolute neutrophil count (ANC) can lead to potentially life-threatening infections, and the risk of serious infection is directly associated with the extent and duration of neutropenia. Because the immune response is impaired in neutropenia, symptoms can be mild and even a low-grade temperature (38°C) should be considered a fever. Initial workup should consist of peripheral and, if applicable, central line blood cultures; further investigation is guided by localization of clinical signs. Empiric antibiotic therapy should be started within the first hour of onset to minimize mortality risk. Treatment should be adjusted as soon as further findings are available.

See also “Fever.”

Icon of a lock

Register or log in , in order to read the full article.

Definitiontoggle arrow icon

  • Neutropenia: ANC < 1500–1000/mm3 [2]
  • Severe neutropenia: ANC < 500/mm3 OR expected to decrease to < 500/mm3 within 48 hours [3][4]
  • Neutropenic fever: temperature ≥ 38°C (100.4°F) for ≥ 1 hour or ≥ 38.3°C (101°F) once in a patient with ANC < 500/mm3 [2][3][4][5]
Icon of a lock

Register or log in , in order to read the full article.

Etiologytoggle arrow icon

Common bacterial pathogens in neutropenic fever [5]
Gram-positive
Gram-negative
Icon of a lock

Register or log in , in order to read the full article.

Diagnosistoggle arrow icon

The diagnostic workup should be guided by the pretest probability of the diagnoses under consideration. The following list includes commonly used methods for diagnosing or ruling out possible etiologies in patients with neutropenic fever. See also “Diagnostic evaluation for fever.”

Avoid rectal temperature measurement in patients with possible neutropenia because of the risk of introducing gut bacteria into the bloodstream through small tears in the perianal skin and mucosa. [5]

Initial investigations [2][5]

Further investigations [5]

Further diagnostics should be guided by clinical features and examination findings (see also “Focused diagnostics” and “Differential diagnoses by affected system” in “Fever”).

Icon of a lock

Register or log in , in order to read the full article.

Managementtoggle arrow icon

Approach [2][5]

Plan treatment for neutropenic fever in consultation with the patient's oncologist.

Neutropenic fever is an emergency! Mortality risk increases if no empiric antibiotic therapy has been initiated after one hour.

Risk stratification

  • There are several methods of assessing risk of mortality in patients with neutropenic fever, including evaluating clinical risk factors and using a validated risk assessment tool.
  • Risk assessment can help determine appropriate clinical therapy (e.g., high-risk patients should be treated as inpatients with IV antibiotics, while select low-risk patients may be considered for outpatient therapy).

Clinical risk assessment in patients with neutropenic fever [5]

The presence of even one high-risk feature is enough to consider inpatient therapy.

MASCC score [8]

A standardized and validated tool for evaluating risk in patients with neutropenic fever.

Patient characteristics Points
Clinical burden of symptoms
  • 5 = mild
  • 3 = moderate
  • 0 = severe
Absence of hypotension
  • 5
Absence of COPD
  • 4
Solid tumor or hematologic malignancy with no previous fungal infection
  • 4
Absence of severe dehydration
  • 3
Patient status when fever occurred
  • 3 = outpatient
  • 0 = inpatient
Age < 60 years
  • 2

Interpretation

In general, any patient who does not strictly fulfill the criteria for being at low risk should be treated as a high-risk patient.

For patients with solid tumors scored as low risk according to the MASCC score, consider additionally calculating the clinical index of stable febrile neutropenia score to determine the likelihood of complications if treated at home. [2]

Outpatient therapy for neutropenic fever [2][5][9]

Icon of a lock

Register or log in , in order to read the full article.

Treatmenttoggle arrow icon

The following focuses primarily on antimicrobial therapy for presumed causes of neutropenic fever. See “Management of neutropenic fever” for a general approach.

Empiric antibiotic therapy for neutropenic fever

Antibiotics are generally continued until an appropriate treatment course is completed (usually 7–14 days depending on site of infection) and the ANC is at least 500 cells/mm3. [5]

Low-risk patients (MASCC ≥ 21) [2][5][9]

Recommended empiric oral antibiotic regimens
No penicillin allergy and not taking fluoroquinolone prophylaxis
Penicillin allergy and not taking fluoroquinolone prophylaxis
Taking fluoroquinolone prophylaxis
  • No longer low-risk, proceed to high-risk recommendations.

High-risk patients (MASCC score < 21) [2][5][9]

Monotherapy with an antipseudomonal beta-lactam (e.g., piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, meropenem, or imipenem) is recommended for patients without penicillin allergy or risk factors for other specific infections (e.g. MRSA, VRE, ESBL organisms).

Recommended empiric IV antibiotic regimens
No penicillin allergy
Penicillin allergy and not taking fluoroquinolone prophylaxis
Penicillin allergy and taking fluoroquinolone prophylaxis
Suspected necrotizing or intraabdominal infection
Risk factors for MRSA and/or a complication associated with a high risk of MRSA infection
Risk factors for VRE
Risk factors for ESBL
Risk factors for CPE
Risk factors for a suspected infection include previous infection and colonization or treatment in a hospital with high rates of endemicity.

Any recurrent fever should be considered a new episode of infection.

Only consider fluoroquinolones for treatment in patients not previously taking fluoroquinolones as prophylaxis. Treat patients who develop neutropenic fever while on fluoroquinolone prophylaxis as high-risk and start an antipseudomonal beta-lactam.

Empiric antifungal therapy for neutropenic fever [5][9]

Give patients who received antifungal prophylaxis a different antifungal agent effective against molds (e.g., from voriconazole to amphotericin B).

Other therapeutic measures

Icon of a lock

Register or log in , in order to read the full article.

Start your trial, and get 5 days of unlimited access to over 1,100 medical articles and 5,000 USMLE and NBME exam-style questions.
disclaimer Evidence-based content, created and peer-reviewed by physicians. Read the disclaimer