Written and peer-reviewed by physicians—but use at your own risk. Read our disclaimer.

banner image

amboss

Trusted medical answers—in seconds.

Get access to 1,000+ medical articles with instant search
and clinical tools.

Try free for 5 days

Atrial fibrillation

Last updated: March 22, 2021

Summarytoggle arrow icon

Atrial fibrillation (Afib) is a common type of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia characterized by uncoordinated atrial activation that results in an irregular ventricular response. While the exact mechanisms of Afib are poorly understood, associations with a number of cardiac (e.g., valvular heart disease, coronary artery disease) and noncardiac (e.g., hyperthyroidism, electrolyte imbalances) risk factors have been established. Individuals with Afib are typically asymptomatic. When symptoms do occur, they usually include palpitations, lightheadedness, and shortness of breath. Physical examination typically reveals an irregularly irregular pulse. Ineffective atrial emptying as a result of Afib can lead to stagnation of blood and clot formation in the atria, which in turn increases the risk of stroke and other thromboembolic complications. Diagnosis is confirmed with ECG showing absent P waves (replaced by fibrillatory waves) with irregular QRS intervals. Echocardiography is used to rule out structural heart disease and to evaluate for any atrial thrombi. Immediate synchronized cardioversion is required in hemodynamically unstable patients. In stable patients, treatment involves the correction of modifiable risk factors, rate or rhythm control strategies, and anticoagulation. Rate-control therapy typically involves the use of beta blockers or nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. Rhythm control strategies include synchronized electrical cardioversion, the use of pharmacological antiarrhythmics (e.g., flecainide, propafenone, or amiodarone), and ablation of the arrhythmogenic tissue. Anticoagulation therapy is used in patients with high-risk comorbidities, such as valvular disease and cardiomyopathy, and may be used in patients categorized as lower-risk depending on the CHA2DS2-VASc score.

Atrial flutter is another common type of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia that is usually caused by a single macroreentrant rhythm within the atria. The risk factors for atrial flutter are similar to those of Afib. In atrial flutter, the ventricular rhythm is usually regular. Treatment is also similar to that of Afib, consisting of anticoagulation and strategies to control heart rate and rhythm. Atrial flutter frequently progresses to Afib.

  • Most common sustained arrhythmia
  • Incidence: increases with age
    • The lifetime risk of Afib among individuals > 40 years is 1 in 4.
    • >95% of individuals with Afib are ≥ 60 years
  • Prevalence: ∼ 1% of US population

References:[1][2]

Epidemiological data refers to the US, unless otherwise specified.

The exact causes of atrial fibrillation are unknown, but several risk factors have been identified (see table below).

Risk factors

Risk factors for atrial fibrillation
Cardiovascular risk factors
Intrinsic cardiac disorders
Noncardiac disorders

Reversible causes of atrial fibrillation [4]

Approx. 15% of individuals who develop Afib have none of the above mentioned risk factors (idiopathic/lone Afib).

Remember PARASITE to memorize the major risk factors for acute Afib: PPulmonary disease; AAnemia; RRheumatic heart disease; AAtrial myxoma; SSepsis; IIschemia; TThyroid disease; EEthanol.

References:[1][2][5][6][7]

Classification of atrial fibrillation [5][8][9]
Terminology Definition
Hemodynamic stability Unstable Afib Afib manifesting with signs of hemodynamic instability (e.g., chest pain, altered mental status, acute pulmonary edema, hypotension, or cardiogenic shock)
Stable Afib Afib without signs of hemodynamic instability
Ventricular rate Afib with rapid ventricular response Afib with a ventricular rate > 100–110/minute (tachycardic Afib) [10][11]
Afib with slow ventricular response [12] Afib with a ventricular rate < 60/minute (bradycardic Afib or slow Afib)
Onset and duration New-onset Afib New presentation or diagnosis of Afib, regardless of duration [13]
Paroxysmal Afib Afib that resolves within 7 days of onset either following treatment or spontaneously; the frequency of recurring episodes may vary.
Persistent Afib Continuous Afib for > 7 days
Long-standing persistent Afib Continuous Afib for > 1 year
Permanent Afib Persistent Afib in which therapeutic attempts are no longer made to convert to or maintain sinus rhythm unless the patient and the treating physician agree to do so [5]
Method of detection Clinical Afib An episode of Afib lasting ≥ 30 seconds that is documented on a surface ECG; may be symptomatic or asymptomatic
Subclinical Afib [9] Asymptomatic Afib not previously detected on a surface ECG that is discovered on implanted cardiac devices and confirmed on intracardiac electrograms [8][9]
Mitral valve involvement [8] Valvular Afib Afib in patients with moderate to severe mitral valve stenosis or an artificial (mechanical) heart valve
Nonvalvular Afib Afib in patients without moderate to severe mitral valve stenosis or a mechanical heart valve

Patients with Afib should always be evaluated for mitral valve involvement!

  • Atrial fibrillation is a supraventricular arrhythmia.
  • The exact mechanisms of Afib are not well understood. Suggested mechanisms include:
  • The new onset of Afib triggers a vicious circle that can ultimately lead to long-standing Afib with atrial remodeling:
    1. Afib is triggered by one or both of the following
    2. Afib is sustained by re-entry rhythms and/or rapid focal ectopic firing
      • Re-entry rhythms are more likely to occur with enlarged atria, diseased heart tissue, and/or aberrant pathways (e.g., WPW syndrome).
    3. Atrial remodeling
      • Electrophysiological changes in the atria occur within a few hours of Afib onset (electrical modeling).
      • If Afib persists, atrial fibrosis and dilatation (structural remodeling) occur within a few months.
      • Electrical and structural remodeling increase susceptibility to Afib, resulting in a vicious circle.
  • Effects of Afib

References:[1][6][14][15]

Individuals with Afib may be asymptomatic for a long time before diagnosis is made.

The brain, kidney, and spleen are the three organs most likely to be damaged by emboli!
References:[16]

Approach [5][17]

  • Suspected Afib: Obtain an ECG.
    • Confirmed Afib (new diagnosis): Perform TTE.
    • Afib is not confirmed on initial ECG but strong clinical suspicion remains: rhythm monitoring
  • All patients: Investigate the underlying cause (see “Etiology of atrial fibrillation”).
    • Obtain laboratory studies.
    • Imaging and advanced cardiac testing depends on the suspected underlying cause

Initial evaluation

ECG [18]

Characteristic ECG findings in atrial fibrillation [18]
Appearance
Rhythm
Rate
  • Variable; Tachycardia is common.
  • Atrial rate > ventricular rate
P waves
  • P waves are indiscernible.
  • Fibrillatory waves (f waves) are seen instead at a frequency of 300–600/minute
    • Recent-onset Afib: prominent, coarse f waves with higher amplitude in leads V1, II, III, and aVF
    • Long-standing Afib: f waves have low amplitudes and may appear as an undulating baseline.
  • PR intervals: not distinguishable
QRS complex

Laboratory studies [5][17][19]

Always assess for reversible causes of Afib, such as hyperthyroidism and electrolyte imbalances.

Transthoracic echocardiogram [5][24]

Chest x-ray [5]

Additional evaluation

Rhythm monitoring [5]

Holter ECG monitoring should be used in ambulatory patients with risk factors and symptoms of arrhythmia to rule out paroxysmal Afib.

Other

The differential diagnoses listed here are not exhaustive.

Approach

Patients with unstable Afib should be treated with immediate electrical cardioversion!

Rate control for atrial fibrillation [5]

  • The goal is to normalize the ventricular heart rate to reduce symptoms.
  • Target resting heart rate [5]
    • < 110/minute: for patients who remain asymptomatic or have normal LV systolic function [30]
    • < 80/minute: for patients who continue to be symptomatic with a lenient rate
  • Consider rate control strategy especially in elderly patients
  • Contraindications: Afib due to preexcitation syndromes

Pharmacological options for rate control

Surgical options for rate control

  • AV nodal ablation and implantation of a permanent ventricular pacemaker
    • Irreversible procedure
    • Eliminates the need for rate-controlling medications but leads to lifelong dependence on a pacemaker.
    • Indications
      • Recurrent Afib
      • Afib refractory to medical rate control
      • Patients who do not tolerate the pharmacological options for Afib management

Rhythm control for atrial fibrillation (i.e., cardioversion) [5]

The following information applies to stable patients. For emergency cardioversion of unstable patients, see “Management of unstable tachycardia with a pulse.”

Overview

Cardioversion increases the risk of thromboembolic complications. All patients with Afib in whom cardioversion is planned should be considered for anticoagulant therapy.

Electrical cardioversion [5][9]

Pharmacological cardioversion [5]

Interventional cardioversion [5]

  • Description: Creation of scar tissue that prevents the spread of ectopic impulses.
    • Catheter radiofrequency ablation of atrial tissue around pulmonary vein openings (pulmonary vein isolation) [9]
    • Maze ablation: a series of incisions are made in the atrial endocardium either via a catheter or surgically to prevent atrial macroentry.
  • Indications: patients undergoing cardiac surgery for other reasons, symptomatic refractory Afib, patient preference, concurrent CHF with reduced LVEF [8][9][31]

Both techniques increase the risk of thromboembolic events; patients must be candidates for anticoagulation to be considered for these procedures.

Anticoagulation during cardioversion in atrial fibrillation [8][9]

Anticoagulation therapy should be considered in all patients undergoing cardioversion.

Anticoagulation during cardioversion in patients with nonvalvular Afib [8]
Type of Afib Patient thromboembolic risk

Before cardioversion

After cardioversion
Afib < 48 hours Low risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score 0 in men and 1 in women)
  • Consider anticoagulation therapy.
  • If the decision is made to anticoagulate, start heparin or a DOAC as soon as possible before cardioversion.
  • Long-term anticoagulation therapy is not routinely required.

Moderate/high risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 in men and ≥ 2 in women)
  • At least 4 weeks of oral anticoagulation therapy after cardioversion
Stable Afib of unknown duration or ≥ 48 hours Any risk
Unstable Afib of unknown duration or ≥ 48 hours Any risk
  • Initiate anticoagulation as soon as possible with heparin or a DOAC.

Unstable patients should receive immediate anticoagulation therapy with rapid-acting anticoagulants before synchronized electrical cardioversion.

Transesophageal echocardiogram for atrial fibrillation [5][9][32]

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications (e.g., ischemic stroke). The decision of whether to start anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter requires careful consideration of the risk of bleeding and the risk of thromboembolism in each individual patient. The choice of anticoagulant depends on patient factors and the urgency of anticoagulation.

Approach

Long-term anticoagulation for patients with Afib in order to prevent thromboembolic complications is indicated if the patient has an underlying valvular disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and/or a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 in men and ≥ 3 in women.

The risk of bleeding due to anticoagulation should always be taken into consideration when initiating anticoagulation therapy.

Risk assessment [8]

Consider in all patients with Afib and atrial flutter regardless of classification and treatment strategy.

Risk assessment for long-term anticoagulation in Afib and atrial flutter
Conditions Recommendation
High risk
  • Anticoagulation is recommended.
Medium risk
  • Consider anticoagulation (risks and benefits should be discussed with the patient).
Low risk
  • Anticoagulation is not routinely recommended.

CHA2DS2-VASc score

CHA2DS2-VASc is a validated scoring system for assessing the risk of stroke in nonvalvular Afib. [36]

CHA2DS2-VASc score [8][37][38]
Risk factor Points
Congestive heart failure or LV dysfunction 1
Hypertension 1
Age ≥ 75 years 2
Diabetes mellitus 1
Prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism 2
Vascular disease 1
Age 65–74 years 1
Sex category: female [39] 1

Risk of stroke [8][38]

  • 0 points (male) or 0–1 point (female): low risk
  • 1 point (male) or 2 points (female): intermediate risk
  • ≥ 2 points (male) or ≥ 3 points (female): high risk

HAS-BLED score [40]

  • The HAS-BLED scoring system is used to assess the risk of bleeding in patients starting anticoagulation. [8][41]
  • Bleeding risk assessment should focus on modifiable risk factors, e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, alcohol use, NSAID or aspirin use.
  • A high-risk HAS-BLED score is not necessarily a reason to withhold anticoagulation; these patients require more frequent monitoring. [38]
HAS-BLED score [40]
Characteristics Points
Hypertension 1
Abnormal renal or liver function 1 point each (max. 2)
Stroke 1
Bleeding history or predisposition 1
Labile INR 1
Elderly individuals (age > 65) 1
Drugs that predispose to bleeding or alcohol use 1 point each (max. 2)

Interpretation [42]

  • 0 points: low risk
  • 1–2 points: moderate risk
  • ≥ 3: high risk

Anticoagulation regimens in atrial fibrillation (and atrial flutter) [5]

  • The choice of anticoagulant is predominantly based on individual patient factors.
  • Patients should be educated on enhanced risks of bleeding and how to reduce them. [43][44]
  • Antiplatelets are no longer recommended as an alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in Afib or atrial flutter. [5][19]
  • Patients starting warfarin: Consider if bridging therapy with heparin is required.
Anticoagulant regimen options in atrial fibrillation and flutter [5][19]
Indications Special considerations Options
Vitamin K antagonists
DOACs
  • Avoid in pregnancy.
  • May not be suitable in severe renal impairment
Heparin
  • In renal impairment, use low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) with caution.

Interventional alternatives to anticoagulation [8]

Hemodynamically unstable

Hemodynamically stable

All patients

Due to the risk of ventricular fibrillation, avoid digoxin, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and amiodarone in patients with Afib with preexcitation.

Clinical features [49]

  • Definition: atrial fibrillation with HR > 100–110/minute
  • Patients may be unstable or stable with or without symptoms.

Diagnostics

See “Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.”

Management of atrial fibrillation with RVR [5][50]

Approach

Patients with unstable Afib should be treated with immediate cardioversion!

Rate control [5][50]

Rhythm control (e.g., cardioversion) [5][8][50]

Management of special situations and complications

Avoid CCBs and beta blockers in decompensated heart failure.

Avoid CCBs, digoxin, and adenosine in patients with preexcitation because of the risk of the arrhythmia converting to ventricular fibrillation

Definition

Epidemiology [55]

  • Incidence: 88 per 100,000 person-years (increases with age)
  • Sex: > (incidence in men is 2.5 times greater than in women)

Etiology

  • Similar to atrial fibrillation (see “Etiology” section above)
  • May additionally result from the treatment of Afib [10]

Pathophysiology

  • Type I (common; ; typical or isthmus-dependent flutter): caused by a counterclockwise (more common) or clockwise (less common) macroreentrant activation of cardiac muscle fibers in the right atrium that travels along the tricuspid annulus and passes through the cavotricuspid isthmus
  • Type II (rare; atypical atrial flutter): various reentrant rhythms that do not involve the cavotricuspid isthmus, are not well-defined, and/or occur in the left atrium

Clinical features

Diagnostics [5][19][56]

  • Similar to atrial fibrillation except for ECG findings (see “Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation”)
  • Characteristic ECG findings
    • Rate: typically 75–150/minute (depending on conduction) [56]
    • Atrial rate ≥ ventricular rate
    • Regular, narrow QRS complexes
    • The rhythm may be:
      • Regularly irregular if atrial flutter occurs with a variable AV block occurring in a fixed pattern (2:1 or 4:1)
      • Irregularly irregular with a variable block occurring in a nonfixed pattern
    • Sawtooth appearance of P waves: identical flutter waves (F waves) that occur in sequence at a rate of ∼ 300/minute
    • Predominantly negative deflections in leads II, III, aVF
    • Flat deflections in I and aVL

Treatment

Complications

  • Frequently degenerates into atrial fibrillation
  • 1:1 conduction leading to life-threatening ventricular tachycardia

Interested in the newest medical research, distilled down to just one minute? Sign up for the One-Minute Telegram in “Tips and links” below.

  1. Ganz LI, Spragg D. Epidemiology of and risk factors for atrial fibrillation. In: Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/epidemiology-of-and-risk-factors-for-atrial-fibrillation.Last updated: June 6, 2016. Accessed: February 24, 2017.
  2. Olshansky B, Arora R. Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. In: Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/mechanisms-of-atrial-fibrillation.Last updated: November 25, 2015. Accessed: February 24, 2017.
  3. Waktare JE. Atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2002; 106 (1): p.14-16. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000022730.66617.D9 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  4. Gutierrez C, Blanchard DG. Atrial Fibrillation: Diagnosis and Treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2011; 83 (1): p.61-68.
  5. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2014; 130 : p.e199-e267. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000041 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  6. Granada J, Uribe W, Chyou P-H, et al. Incidence and predictors of atrial flutter in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36 (7): p.2242-2246. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00982-7 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  7. Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia. Circulation. 2016; 133 (14): p.e506–e574. doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000311 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  8. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37 (38): p.2893-2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  9. Cosío FG. Atrial Flutter, Typical and Atypical: A Review. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2017; 6 (2): p.55. doi: 10.15420/aer.2017:5:2 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  10. Martindale JL, deSouza IS, Silverberg M, Freedman J, Sinert R. β-Blockers versus calcium channel blockers for acute rate control of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2015; 22 (3): p.150-154. doi: 10.1097/mej.0000000000000227 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  11. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, et al. Part 8: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010; 122 (18_suppl_3): p.S729-S767. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.970988 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  12. Atzema CL, Barrett TW. Managing atrial fibrillation.. Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 65 (5): p.532-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.12.010 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  13. Pluymaekers NAHA, Dudink EAMP, Luermans JGLM, et al. Early or Delayed Cardioversion in Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380 (16): p.1499-1508. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1900353 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  14. DeSimone CV, Naksuk N, Asirvatham SJ. Supraventricular Arrhythmias: Clinical Framework and Common Scenarios for the Internist. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2018; 93 (12): p.1825-1841. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.07.019 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  15. Means K, Gentry A, Nguyen T. Intravenous Continuous Infusion vs. Oral Immediate-release Diltiazem for Acute Heart Rate Control. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018; 19 (2): p.417-422. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.10.33832 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  16. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74 (1): p.104-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  17. European Society of Cardiology. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2020 . doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  18. Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Lameson JL, Loscalzo J. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. McGraw-Hill Education ; 2015
  19. Alonso A, Lopez FL, Matsushita K, et al. Chronic kidney disease is associated with the incidence of atrial fibrillation: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.. Circulation. 2011; 123 (25): p.2946-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.020982 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  20. Ezekowitz MD, Aikens TH, Nagarakanti R, Shapiro T. Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2011; 124 (1): p.95-99. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.967455 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  21. Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vaziri SM, D'agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort: The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 1994; 271 (11): p.840-844.
  22. Fischer A, Ousdigian KT, Johnson JW, Gillberg JM, Wilkoff BL. The impact of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rates and device programming on shocks in 106,513 ICD and CRT-D patients. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9 (1): p.24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.08.005 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  23. Goldberger AL, Goldberger ZD, Shvilkin A. Bradycardias and Tachycardias. Elsevier ; 2018 : p. 194-210
  24. AHRQ Evidence Report Summaries.
  25. Rosenthal L. Atrial Fibrillation. Atrial Fibrillation. New York, NY: WebMD. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/151066. Updated: January 2, 2016. Accessed: February 20, 2017.
  26. Gutierrez C, Blanchard DG. Diagnosis and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.. Am Fam Physician. 2016; 94 (6): p.442-52.
  27. Soliman EZ, Bhave PD, Chen LY. Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Atrial Arrhythmias. JAMA. 2019; 322 (7): p.688-689. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10925 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  28. Huang WA, Dunipace EA, Sorg JM, Vaseghi M. Liver Disease as a Predictor of New‐Onset Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7 (15). doi: 10.1161/jaha.118.008703 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  29. Cardiac Biomarkers and Heart Failure. https://www.acc.org/%2Flatest-in-cardiology%2Farticles%2F2015%2F02%2F09%2F13%2F00%2Fcardiac-biomarkers-and-heart-failure. Updated: February 10, 2015. Accessed: June 18, 2020.
  30. Shin D-I, Jaekel K, Schley P, et al. Plasma levels of NT-pro-BNP in patients with atrial fibrillation before and after electrical cardioversion. Z Kardiol. 2005; 94 (12): p.795-800. doi: 10.1007/s00392-005-0301-7 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  31. Shopp JD, Stewart LK, Emmett TW, Kline JA. Findings From 12-lead Electrocardiography That Predict Circulatory Shock From Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2015; 22 (10): p.1127-1137. doi: 10.1111/acem.12769 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  32. Troughton RW, Asher CR, Klein AL. The role of echocardiography in atrial fibrillation and cardioversion.. Heart. 2003; 89 (12): p.1447-54. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.12.1447 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  33. Kim T-S, Youn H-J. Role of Echocardiography in Atrial Fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2011; 19 (2): p.51. doi: 10.4250/jcu.2011.19.2.51 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  34. Sanfilippo AJ, Abascal VM, Sheehan M, et al. Atrial enlargement as a consequence of atrial fibrillation. A prospective echocardiographic study.. Circulation. 1990; 82 (3): p.792-797. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.3.792 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  35. Imazio M, Lazaros G, Picardi E, et al. Incidence and prognostic significance of new onset atrial fibrillation/flutter in acute pericarditis. Heart. 2015; 101 (18): p.1463-1467. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307398 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  36. Abbott AV. Diagnostic approach to palpitations.. Am Fam Physician. 2005; 71 (4): p.743-50.
  37. Buttà C, Tuttolomondo A, Giarrusso L, Pinto A. Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Atrial Tachycardia: Classification, P-Wave Morphology, and Differential Diagnosis with Other Supraventricular Tachycardias. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. 2014; 20 (4): p.314-327. doi: 10.1111/anec.12246 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  38. Kelly JP, DeVore AD, Wu J, et al. Rhythm Control Versus Rate Control in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From Get With The Guidelines—Heart Failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8 (24). doi: 10.1161/jaha.118.011560 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  39. Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A, et al. Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383 (14): p.1305-1316. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2019422 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  40. Van Gelder IC, Groenveld HF, Crijns HJGM, et al. Lenient versus Strict Rate Control in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362 (15): p.1363-1373. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1001337 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  41. Stiell IG, Birnie D. Managing Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 57 (1): p.31-32. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.04.006 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  42. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Perry JJ, et al. Association of the Ottawa Aggressive Protocol with rapid discharge of emergency department patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter. CJEM. 2010; 12 (03): p.181-191. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012227 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  43. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Rowe BH, et al. Outcomes for Emergency Department Patients With Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Treated in Canadian Hospitals. Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 69 (5): p.562-571.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.10.013 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  44. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14 (10): p.e275-e444. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  45. Badhwar V, Rankin JS, Damiano RJ, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017; 103 (1): p.329-341. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.076 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  46. Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE, et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57 (9): p.1126-1166. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.002 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  47. Grewal GK, Klosterman TB, Shrestha K, et al. Indications for TEE Before Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Appropriateness Criteria. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5 (6): p.641-648. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.12.020 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  48. Blackshear JL, Pearce LA, Hart RG, et al. Aortic Plaque in Atrial Fibrillation. Stroke. 1999; 30 (4): p.834-840. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.4.834 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  49. Fohtung RB, Rich MW. Identification of Patients at Risk of Stroke From Atrial Fibrillation. US Cardiology Review. 2016; 10 (2): p.60-63. doi: 10.15420/usc.2016:1:1 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  50. Friberg L, Rosenqvist M, Lip GYH. Evaluation of risk stratification schemes for ischaemic stroke and bleeding in 182 678 patients with atrial fibrillation: the Swedish Atrial Fibrillation cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33 (12): p.1500-1510. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr488 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  51. Lip GYH, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJGM. Refining Clinical Risk Stratification for Predicting Stroke and Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation Using a Novel Risk Factor-Based Approach. Chest. 2010; 137 (2): p.263-272. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1584 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  52. Lip GYH, Banerjee A, Boriani G, et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation. Chest. 2018; 154 (5): p.1121-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.07.040 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  53. Nielsen PB, Skjøth F, Overvad TF, Larsen TB, Lip GYH. Female Sex Is a Risk Modifier Rather Than a Risk Factor for Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2018; 137 (8): p.832-840. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.117.029081 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  54. Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJGM, Lip GYH. A Novel User-Friendly Score (HAS-BLED) To Assess 1-Year Risk of Major Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Chest. 2010; 138 (5): p.1093-1100. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0134 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  55. Lip GYH, Frison L, Halperin JL, Lane DA. Comparative Validation of a Novel Risk Score for Predicting Bleeding Risk in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57 (2): p.173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.024 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  56. Lip GYH, Banerjee A, Lagrenade I, Lane DA, Taillandier S, Fauchier L. Assessing the Risk of Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5 (5): p.941-948. doi: 10.1161/circep.112.972869 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  57. Habert JS. Minimizing bleeding risk in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention. International Journal of General Medicine. 2016; Volume 9 : p.337-347. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s109104 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  58. Hawes E. Patient Education on Oral Anticoagulation. Pharmacy. 2018; 6 (2): p.34. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6020034 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  59. Qamar A, Vaduganathan M, Greenberger NJ, Giugliano RP. Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Liver Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71 (19): p.2162-2175. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.023 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  60. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017; 135 (25). doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000503 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  61. Anticoagulation Interruption in Atrial Fibrillation – a BRIDGE Too Far?. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2015/08/20/07/58/anticoagulation-interruption-in-atrial-fibrillation. . Accessed: August 20, 2015.
  62. Sharma SP, Park P, Lakkireddy D. Left Atrial Appendages Occlusion: Current Status and Prospective. Korean Circ J. 2018; 48 (8): p.692. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0231 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  63. Herold G. Internal Medicine. Herold G ; 2014
  64. AVNRT for two. http://lifeinthefastlane.com/avnrt-ecg/. Updated: February 20, 2017. Accessed: February 20, 2017.
  65. Kibos AS, Knight BP, Essebag V, Fishberger SB, Slevin M, Ţintoiu LC. Cardiac Arrhythmias: From Basic Mechanism to State-of-the-Art Management. Springer ; 2013
  66. Adelmann GA. Cardiology Essentials in Clinical Practice. Springer ; 2011
  67. Al-Salem A. The Acute Chest Syndrome in Sickle Cell Anemia. Springer ; 2015
  68. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2019; 140 (2). doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000665 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  69. Noseworthy PA, Kaufman ES, Chen LY, et al. Subclinical and Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation: Pondering the Knowledge Gap: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019; 140 (25): p.e944-e963. doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000740 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  70. Wang TY. Effectively Initiating and Maintaining Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2019; 139 (15): p.1763-1765. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.118.037564 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  71. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP et al.. A Comparison of Rate Control and Rhythm Control in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347 (23): p.1825-1833. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa021328 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  72. Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, et al. A Comparison of Rate Control and Rhythm Control in Patients with Recurrent Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347 (23): p.1834-1840. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa021375 . | Open in Read by QxMD