Gastrointestinal bleeding

Last updated: November 15, 2023

Summarytoggle arrow icon

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding can be caused by a number of conditions. It can manifest as overt GI bleeding with hematemesis, melena, or hematochezia, or as occult GI bleeding, with nonspecific symptoms related to iron deficiency anemia. GI bleeding can be classified as upper GI bleeding (UGIB) if the site of hemorrhage is proximal to the ligament of Treitz (e.g., esophageal variceal bleeding, bleeding peptic ulcer) or as lower GI bleeding (LGIB) if the site of hemorrhage is distal to the ligament of Treitz (e.g., diverticular bleeding, malignancy, small bowel bleeding). Overt UGIB typically manifests with hematemesis; hematochezia and melena may occur if the bleeding is brisk. Overt LGIB typically manifests with hematochezia; melena may occur if the bleeding is from the small bowel or proximal colon. The initial management of a patient with overt GI bleeding should focus on hemodynamic resuscitation and endoscopic identification of the source of hemorrhage, if feasible, or via angiography, followed by measures to control bleeding (endoscopically, surgically, or via angioembolization). Sigmoidoscopy is an appropriate initial investigation in young patients with scant hematochezia and no features of underlying malignancy or IBD. In all patients (i.e., with overt or occult GI bleeding), the underlying cause should be identified and treated.

Definitiontoggle arrow icon

  • Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB)
  • Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB)
  • Occult GI bleeding: bleeding in quantities too small to be macroscopically observable (requires chemical tests or microscopic examination to be detected)
  • Overt GI bleeding: macroscopically observable bleeding with accompanying clinical symptoms (e.g., anemia, tachycardia)
  • Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: gastrointestinal bleeding that persists or recurs after an initial negative evaluation to find the source of bleeding.

Etiologytoggle arrow icon

Most common etiologies of GI bleeding [3]

Overview of the most common etiologies of GI bleeding
Erosive or inflammatory
Traumatic or iatrogenic
  • Lower abdominal trauma
  • Anorectal trauma (e.g., anorectal avulsion, impalement injuries)
Other causes

See “Differential diagnosis of lower gastrointestinal bleeding in children.”

Bleeding from the upper respiratory tract (e.g., nocturnal nosebleeds) can be mistaken for GI bleeding because the blood can be swallowed and vomited or appear in the stool as melena. Careful examination and history taking is the key to differentiating respiratory sources of bleeding from GI ones.

Clinical featurestoggle arrow icon

Features of overt GI bleeding
Description Cause
  • Vomiting blood, which may be red or coffee-ground in appearance
  • Black, tarry stool with a strong offensive odor
  • Most commonly due to bleeding in the upper GI tract
  • Can also occur in bleeding from the small bowel or the right colon
  • The passage of bright red (fresh) blood through the anus (with or without stool)
    • Colonic bleeding: maroon, jelly-like traces of blood in stools
    • Rectal bleeding: streaks of fresh blood on stools

Both melena and hematochezia can be caused by either UGIB or LGIB.

Unexplained iron deficiency anemia (e.g., in men or postmenopausal women) should raise suspicion for GI bleeding.

Managementtoggle arrow icon

The following recommendations are consistent with the 2021 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) upper GI and ulcer bleeding guideline, the 2019 International Consensus Group (ICG) nonvariceal UGIB guidelines, the 2016 ACG LGIB guideline, and the 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (AGSE) LGIB guidelines. [5][6][7][8]

All patients [5][6][7][8][9]

Upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, and transcatheter angiography are dual diagnostic/therapeutic procedures that allow rapid localization of the source of bleeding and hemostatic interventions.

Stable patients

Unstable patients

Exercise caution with volume resuscitation in the absence of massive ongoing bleeding or hemorrhagic shock, especially if the source of hemorrhage is inadequately controlled. Aggressive crystalloid and blood product administration in these patients can increase the risk of rebleeding and death. [6][10]

Urgent consultations [11]

Consult surgery and interventional radiology early for patients with ongoing severe hemorrhage and high-risk features of GI bleeding (especially those too unstable to tolerate bowel preparation).

Empiric pharmacotherapeutic interventionstoggle arrow icon

The measures described below should be initiated as soon as possible prior to procedures (e.g., endoscopy, angioembolization).

Pretreatment other than anticoagulant reversal (if indicated) should not delay definitive diagnosis and hemostatic interventions.

Evidence does not support the routine use of tranexamic acid in patients with acute GI bleeding. [19]

Risk stratificationtoggle arrow icon


All patients with GI bleeding should be risk-stratified to guide the diagnostic and therapeutic approach, timing of endoscopy, and patient disposition.

High-risk features of GI bleeding [6][9][12]

Patient factors

Features at presentation
Interpretation: > 1 feature is associated with a risk of severe or recurrent bleeding
Glasgow Blatchford score [12][22]
Parameters Findings Score
Laboratory features BUN < 18.2 mg/dL 0
18.2 mg/dL–22.3 mg/dL 2
22.4 mg/dL–27.9 mg/dL 3
28 mg/dL–69.9 mg/dL 4
≥ 70 mg/dL 6
Hemoglobin : > 13 g/dL : > 12 g/dL 0
: 12–13 g/dL : 10–12 g/dL 1
: 10–12 g/dL : N/A 3
: < 10 g/dL : < 10 g/dL 6
Clinical features Systolic blood pressure > 110 mm Hg 0
100–109 mm Hg 1
90–99 mm Hg 2
< 90 mm Hg 3
Additional criteria

Heart rate ≥ 100/min

Melena at presentation 1
Syncope at presentation 2
Liver disease 2
Heart failure 2


  • Score 0: low-likelihood of rebleeding or need for urgent intervention
  • Score ≥ 1: higher likelihood of rebleeding and/or need for urgent intervention [23]

Post-endoscopy [6][12][24]

  • Colonoscopy: Inpatient treatment is recommended if there are features requiring intervention or associated with rebleeding.
  • Upper endoscopy: The Forrest classification is commonly used to determine the need for hemostatic interventions during the procedure and can help guide disposition by predicting the risk of rebleeding.
Forrest classification of bleeding peptic ulcers [25]
Stage Description Risk of recurring hemorrhage

Active hemorrhage

(Stage I)

Ia Spurting arterial hemorrhage ∼ 90%
Ib Actively oozing hemorrhage ∼ 50%

Evidence of a recent hemorrhage

(Stage II)

IIa Nonbleeding ulcer with a visible vessel ∼ 50%
IIb Ulcer with an adherent clot ∼ 30%
IIc Flat ulcer with a dark base (covered with hematin) ∼ 10%

Clean-based ulcer

(Stage III)

III Flat ulcer base (no active hemorrhage) < 5%
  • Low risk (Forrest IIc–III): can usually be managed as outpatients with PPI therapy
  • Higher risk (Forrest I–IIb): Typically require inpatient care

Diagnosticstoggle arrow icon

Approach to low-risk GI bleeding

Approach to overt GI bleeding

Diagnostic approach for overt GI bleeding [6][26]
Suspected UGIB [10][12] Suspected LGIB [5]
Supportive features [27]
Testing strategy for hemodynamically stable patients
Testing strategy for hemodynamically unstable patient

Laboratory studies [9]

Anemia, low hematocrit, coagulopathy, and elevated BUN at presentation are signs of severe GI bleeding. [6]

An elevated BUN to creatinine ratio in a patient with hematochezia suggests a brisk UGIB. [6][29]

Nasogastric aspirate (NG aspirate) [6]

This test is not routinely recommended other than as an adjunct in patients with hematochezia with only moderate PTP of UGIB as the source. [5]

  • Procedure: Instill 200–300 ml of warm isotonic saline via NG tube, then aspirate gastric contents for inspection. [30]
  • Findings
    • Positive: Bright red blood or coffee-grounds; active UGIB confirmed [12][31]
    • Inconclusive: Nonbloody and nonbilious
    • Negative: Nonbloody and bilious ; active UGIB less likely

In patients with suspected UGIB, nasogastric tube aspiration is poorly sensitive as ∼ 15% of patients with active UGIB can have a false negative result. [12]


These procedures allow for bleeding source identification, diagnostic biopsies (e.g., for gastric or colorectal cancer), and hemostatic interventions (e.g., epinephrine injection, vessel clipping). They should ideally be performed within 24 hours of admission.

EGD [5][6][8][10][12]

Consider intubation prior to endoscopy if there is a high risk of aspiration.

Colonoscopy [5][6]

Lower endoscopy without bowel preparation (including sigmoidoscopy) is not recommended in the workup of acute LGIB. [6]

Angiography [28][29][35]

Optimize hydration before CTA or transcatheter angiography to mitigate the risk of contrast nephropathy (patients with severe GI bleeding are already at high risk due to hypovolemia).

Evaluation of small bowel bleeding [26][36]

Consider the following in addition to CT angiography:

VCE is preferred in hemodynamically stable patients with negative EGD and colonoscopy. Hemodynamically unstable patients with suspected small bowel bleeding should undergo angiography. [26]

Treatmenttoggle arrow icon

Approach [5][6][7]

Endoscopic hemostasis [6][7][12]

  • Indications: any high-risk endoscopic findings
    • Signs of active bleeding
    • Nonbleeding visible vessel
    • Adherent clot [7][12]
  • Modalities [12]

Interventional radiology (angiography) [5][6][7][26][35]


CTA for hemorrhage localization prior to surgery can help plan a more targeted intervention (e.g., bowel resection) and reduce perioperative risk (e.g., due to a missed source of bleeding). [6]

Treatment of the underlying cause

Monitoring and dispositiontoggle arrow icon

Determining patient disposition should be a multifactorial decision based on a combination of risk stratification, patient factors (e.g., functional status, support system), and available healthcare resources. [5][6][9][12]

Inpatient [5][6][9][12][23]

Outpatient [5][6][8][9][12][23][37]

  • Discharge without a period of observation may be possible for patients with:
  • Discharge after a period of observation can be considered if all the following parameters are met: The optimal duration of the observation period is unclear and practice varies (e.g., 6–24 hours).
  • Follow-up: Advise follow-up within 24 hours (earlier if symptoms recur) for further diagnostic evaluation and long-term management as needed.

Acute management checklisttoggle arrow icon

All inpatients

Suspected UGIB

Suspected LGIB

Differential diagnosestoggle arrow icon

Differential diagnoses of upper GI bleeding

Differential diagnoses of lower GI bleeding

The differential diagnoses listed here are not exhaustive.

Complicationstoggle arrow icon

We list the most important complications. The selection is not exhaustive.

Referencestoggle arrow icon

  1. Pasha SF, Shergill A, Acosta RD, et al. Guideline: The role of endoscopy in the patient with lower GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 79 (6): p.875-885.doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.039 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  2. Strate LL, Gralnek IM. ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111 (4): p.459-474.doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.41 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  3. Barkun AN, Almadi M, Kuipers EJ, et al. Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 171 (11): p.805.doi: 10.7326/m19-1795 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  4. Laine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, Martel M, Leontiadis GI. ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021; 116 (5): p.899-917.doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  5. Walls R, Hockberger R, Gausche-Hill M. Rosen's Emergency Medicine. Elsevier Health Sciences ; 2018
  6. Hwang JH, Shergill AK, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80 (2): p.221-227.doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.023 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  7. Ramaswamy RS, Choi HW, Mouser HC, et al. Role of interventional radiology in the management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding.. World journal of radiology. 2014; 6 (4): p.82-92.doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i4.82 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  8. Hwang JH, Fisher DA, Ben-Menachem T, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75 (6): p.1132-1138.doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.033 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  9. Oakland K, Kothiwale S, Forehand T, et al. External Validation of the Oakland Score to Assess Safe Hospital Discharge Among Adult Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the US. JAMA Network Open. 2020; 3 (7): p.e209630.doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9630 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  10. Oakland K, Jairath V, Uberoi R, et al. Derivation and validation of a novel risk score for safe discharge after acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a modelling study. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2017; 2 (9): p.635-643.doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(17)30150-4 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  11. Laursen SB, Hansen JM, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB. The Glasgow Blatchford Score Is the Most Accurate Assessment of Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2012; 10 (10): p.1130-1135.e1.doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.06.022 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  12. Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, et al. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2017: p.i6432.doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6432 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  13. Gralnek I, Dumonceau J-M, Kuipers E, et al. Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. . 2015; 47 (10): p.a1-a46.doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393172 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  14. Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ. Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease- 2 Volume Set. Elsevier ; 2020
  15. DeLaney M, Greene CJ. Emergency Department Evaluation And Management Of Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.. Emergency Medicine Practice. 2015.
  16. Bong Sik Matthew Kim, Bob T Li, Alexander Engel, Jaswinder S Samra, Stephen Clarke, Ian D Norton, and Angela E Li. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding: A practical guide for clinicians. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology. 2014.
  17. Hayashi Y, Yamamoto H, Yano T, Sugano K. Diagnosis and management of mid-gastrointestinal bleeding by double-balloon endoscopy. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2009; 2 (2): p.109-117.doi: 10.1177/1756283X09102315 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  18. Kevin A. Ghassemi and Dennis M. Jensen. Lower GI Bleeding: Epidemiology and Management. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2013.doi: 10.1007/s11894-013-0333-5 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  19. Gurudu SR, Bruining DH, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of suspected small-bowel bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85 (1): p.22-31.doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.013 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  20. Simel D, Rennie D. The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis. McGraw-Hill Prof Med/Tech ; 2008
  21. Karuppasamy K, Kapoor B, Fidelman N, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Radiologic management of lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020.doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.02.018 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  22. Wells ML, Hansel SL, Bruining DH, et al. CT for Evaluation of Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding. RadioGraphics. 2018; 38 (4): p.1089-1107.doi: 10.1148/rg.2018170138 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  23. Patel V, Nicastro J. Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.. Clinics in colon and rectal surgery. 2020; 33 (1): p.42-44.doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1695037 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  24. Pallin DJ, Saltzman JR. Is nasogastric tube lavage in patients with acute upper GI bleeding indicated or antiquated?. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74 (5): p.981-4.doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.007 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  25. Kang SH, Hyun JJ. Preparation and Patient Evaluation for Safe Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Clinical Endoscopy. 2013; 46 (3): p.212.doi: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.212 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  26. Barkun AN. International Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152 (2): p.101.doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00009 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  27. Jung K, Moon W. Role of endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal bleeding in real clinical practice: An evidence-based review. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2019; 11 (2): p.68-83.doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.68 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  28. Singh-Bhinder N, Kim DH, Holly BP, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14 (5): p.S177-S188.doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.038 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  29. Gerson LB, Fidler JL, Cave DR, Leighton JA. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110 (9): p.1265-1287.doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.246 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  30. Liebler JM, Benner K, Putnam T, Vollmer WM.. Respiratory complications in critically ill medical patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.. Critical Care Medicine. 1991.
  31. John R Saltzman, MD, FACP, FACG, FASGE, AGAF. Approach to acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in adults. In: Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate. Last updated: February 12, 2019. Accessed: July 1, 2019.
  32. Banister T, Spiking J, Ayaru L. Discharge of patients with an acute upper gastrointestinal bleed from the emergency department using an extended Glasgow-Blatchford Score.. BMJ open gastroenterology. 2018; 5 (1): p.e000225.doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000225 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  33. Laine L, Jensen DM. Management of Patients With Ulcer Bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012; 107 (3): p.345-360.doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.480 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  34. Ali Khan M, Howden CW. The Role of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders.. Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2018; 14 (3): p.169-175.
  35. Angeli P, Bernardi M, Villanueva C, et al. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018; 69 (2): p.406-460.doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  36. Ioannou GN, Doust J, Rockey DC. Terlipressin for acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003.doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd002147 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  37. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee., Acosta RD, Abraham NS, et al. The management of antithrombotic agents for patients undergoing GI endoscopy.. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83 (1): p.3-16.doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.035 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  38. Abraham NS, Barkun AN, Sauer BG, et al. American College of Gastroenterology-Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Management of Anticoagulants and Antiplatelets During Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding and the Periendoscopic Period. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022; 117 (4): p.542-558.doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001627 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  39. Roberts I, Shakur-Still H, Afolabi A, et al. Effects of a high-dose 24-h infusion of tranexamic acid on death and thromboembolic events in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (HALT-IT): an international randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet. 2020; 395 (10241): p.1927-1936.doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30848-5 . | Open in Read by QxMD

Icon of a lock3 free articles remaining

You have 3 free member-only articles left this month. Sign up and get unlimited access.
 Evidence-based content, created and peer-reviewed by physicians. Read the disclaimer