ambossIconambossIcon

Approach to the poisoned patient

Last updated: January 9, 2025

CME information and disclosurestoggle arrow icon

To see contributor disclosures related to this article, hover over this reference: [1]

Physicians may earn CME/MOC credit by reading information in this article to address a clinical question, and then completing a brief evaluation, in which they will identify their question and report the impact of any information learned on their clinical practice.

AMBOSS designates this Internet point-of-care activity for a maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

For answers to questions about AMBOSS CME, including how to redeem CME/MOC credit, see “Tips and Links” at the bottom of this article.

Summarytoggle arrow icon

This article provides a general approach to patients with possible acute poisoning due to potentially toxic substances, including medications, recreational drugs, and environmental substances. Although few poisonings are fatal, acute poisoning can be a challenging medical emergency. Toxicity depends on exposure characteristics (e.g., substance type, route, dosage, timing) and patient characteristics (e.g., age and comorbidities). Management is guided by a toxicological risk assessment based on the clinical evaluation of poisoning and individualized diagnostics and monitoring. Initial management of critically ill patients should follow an ABCDE approach adapted to poisoning, which includes rapid identification of classic toxidromes, acute stabilization, and if indicated, early decontamination (e.g., activated charcoal), enhanced elimination (e.g., hemodialysis), and antidote administration (e.g., naloxone for opioid overdose). Consultation with a toxicologist or regional poison control center (in the United States, Poison Control is available 24/7 at 1-800-222-1222) is required in most cases. Admission and frequent reevaluation are often necessary due to altered substance pharmacokinetics, dynamic clinical manifestations, and the risk of delayed complications.

Initial managementtoggle arrow icon

Approach

Anticipate and prepare for changes in hemodynamic and mental status, as toxic substances are metabolized gradually.

The combination of hypotension and bradycardia suggests cardiovascular drug poisoning. [2]

Airway [2][3][4][5]

Assessment

Management

Breathing [2][3][4][5]

Assessment

Management

In mechanically ventilated patients with severe metabolic acidosis, optimize tidal volume and respiratory rate to match the patient's respiratory compensation.

Circulation [2][3][4][5]

Assessment

Management

Disability [2][3][4][5]

Assessment

Management

Do not treat toxic seizures with phenytoin, which can worsen the cardiotoxic effects of certain drugs (tricyclic antidepressants, theophylline, and cocaine) and is ineffective in seizures caused by withdrawal or isoniazid. [14][19]

Exposure [2][3][4][5]

Assessment

Management

Classic toxidromes

Recognition of classic toxidromes is essential to the evaluation of patients poisoned with an unknown substance. Note that, in practice, toxidromes may manifest more subtly than what is described here.

Classic toxidromes [2][4][11]
Vital signs Mental status Pupils Other examination findings
Sedative-hypnotic toxidrome
  • Poor reactivity to light
Opioid toxidrome
  • Decreased bowel sounds
Cholinergic toxidrome (muscarinic)
  • ↓ HR
  • Variable RR
  • ↓ BP
  • SaO2
  • Can be altered or normal
Cholinergic toxidrome (nicotinic)
  • ↑ HR
  • ↑ BP
  • Normal
Anticholinergic toxidrome
Serotonin toxicity
  • Hyperthermia
  • ↑ HR
  • ↑ RR
  • ↑/↓ BP (Variability in BP is a feature of autonomic instability.)
Sympathomimetic toxidrome

In patients taking serotonergic medications, clonus and hyperreflexia should raise suspicion for serotonin syndrome. [20]

For patients with anticholinergic syndrome, remember: blind as a bat, mad as a hatter, red as a beet, hot as a hare, and dry as a bone!

Toxicological risk assessmenttoggle arrow icon

General principles

Risk assessment in toxicology is based on the overall clinical evaluation and helps guide interventions that could:

  • Convert potentially fatal toxic exposures to nonfatal toxic exposures
  • Convert potentially toxic exposures to nontoxic exposures

Key components [2][14]

  • Focused toxicological history and physical examination, including:
    • Collateral history
    • Substance identification, e.g., using online drug databases or pill identifier tools (see “Tips & links”)
    • Estimation of toxicity; often requires consulting poison control and/or material safety data sheets
  • Routine and confirmatory diagnostic studies (See “Diagnostics.”)
  • Clinical or diagnostic evidence of complications
  • Assessment of patient factors that increase risk of toxicity (e.g., age, kidney function, liver function)
  • Monitoring parameters indicating response to therapy, e.g., serial ECGs, serial quantitative drug levels.

The dose of a toxic substance exposure is a key determinant of the effects, i.e., “the dose makes the poison.”

Avoid anchoring bias by comparing the history of exposure and expected toxicological effects with physical and diagnostic findings over the course of the evaluation.

Risk-based decision-making

Categorize the risk presented by a toxic exposure along the following spectrum (from high to low):

  • Immediate threat to life and/or cognitive function
  • Potential for permanent organ damage
    • Consider antidotes, decontamination, or enhanced elimination early to preserve organ function.
    • Consider the need for organ transplant (may require interfacility transfer).
  • Risk of life-threatening complications (e.g., seizures, cardiac arrhythmias, aspiration)
    • Consider antidotes, decontamination, or enhanced elimination early to prevent complications.
    • Prepare to provide supportive care if complications occur.
  • Uncertain risk
    • Consider admission for observation and monitoring.
    • Consider additional investigations and consultations.
  • Low risk (e.g., does not meet the threshold of toxic ingestion)
    • Provide reassurance.
    • Consider discharge with return instructions after a period of observation.

Clinical evaluationtoggle arrow icon

Approach [2][11][14]

  • Sources of information
    • Obtain as much information directly from patients as possible, reassuring them about confidentiality.
    • Seek collateral sources of information.
      • EMS providers, e.g., circumstances at the scene, including any bottles found
      • Family/friends, e.g., history of drug use, recent concerning statements or changes in behavior
      • Chart review or pharmacy, e.g., for a list of current and recent prescription medications
      • Witnesses or bystanders
  • Key historical elements
    • Drug-related: e.g., drug class, immediate vs. extended-release formulation, amount, time of ingestion [2][14]
    • Patient-related: e.g., age, comorbidities, clinical status
    • Attempt to quantify the toxic dose ingested per kg of weight.
    • Consider the possibility of multiple co-ingested substances.
  • Key physical examination elements
    • Examine the skin, eyes, abdomen, and neurological system.
    • Identify classic toxidromes.
    • Identify cardinal signs of specific poisonings.

Clinical effects of a given substance at toxic (supratherapeutic) doses can vary dramatically from the expected side effects at therapeutic doses.

Focused history

History obtained initially can be unreliable for various reasons, for example:

  • Only secondhand information is available (i.e., the patient is unresponsive or altered).
  • Patients may feel the need to conceal information about the exposure.
Focused toxicological history [2][11][14]
Questions Description
Who?
What?
  • Exposure characteristics: confer an increased risk
    • High dose
    • High toxicity (e.g., narrow therapeutic index)
    • Extended-release formulation
    • Any co-ingestions
  • Unknown toxin: attempt to identify by asking about:
    • All recently prescribed medications
    • Any nonprescribed medications, supplements, herbals, etc.
    • Occupation and hobbies
    • If bottles are found, do not rely solely on labels, since patients may use bottles to store other medications. Use a pill identifier tool; see “Tips & Links.” [2]
How?
  • Route of exposure: e.g., oral, intravenous, transdermal, rectal
When?
  • Important times to document
    • Exact time and duration of exposure [2]
    • Time elapsed since exposure
    • Time of symptom onset
Why?
  • Unintentional exposure
    • Iatrogenic: e.g., incorrect dose prescribed or given
    • Patient-related: e.g., misunderstanding regarding prescribed dose, inability to read or understand the bottle label, new or worsening cognitive disorder.
  • Intentional exposure

Reevaluate the clinical hypothesis if physical findings and diagnostic studies are inconsistent with toxic effects expected from the exposure history.

Focused physical examination

Focused toxicological physical examination [2][11][14]
Examination Description
Weight
Odors
Skin
Eyes and mucous membranes
Abdomen
Neurological exam

Reassess the patient frequently. Examination findings can change as the toxic substance metabolizes.

Intoxication with certain substances can cause the loss of some brainstem reflexes. A diagnosis of brain death can only be made in the absence of intoxication. [21]

Diagnosticstoggle arrow icon

General principles [2][4][13][14]

  • Targeted investigations based on the clinical evaluation are typically preferred over blanket testing and screening.
  • Document the time blood was drawn, so that results can be accurately interpreted.
  • General serum or urine screening panels for multiple substances are not routinely recommended. [2][4]

Serum and urine screening panels often have false-positive or false-negative results. They may indicate past exposure to a substance and may not explain the current clinical presentation. [2][4]

Routine studies

Classic causes of high anion gap metabolic acidosis: CAT MUDPILES (Cyanide/Carbon monoxide, Aspirin/Alcoholic ketoacidosis, Toluene, Methanol/Metformin, Uremia, Diabetic ketoacidosis, Paraldehyde/Propylene glycol, Isoniazid, Lactic acidosis, Ethylene glycol, Salicylates) [2]

Classic causes of high osmolar gap: ME DIE (Methanol, Ethylene glycol, Diuretics (mannitol)/Diabetic ketoacidosis, Isopropyl alcohol, Ethanol)

Acetaminophen levels may not be detectable if the patient presents > 18 hours after overdose. [13]

Additional laboratory studies

Imaging [2][20]

Routine imaging is unnecessary; consider the following on a case-by-case basis:

To remember foreign substances with a radiopaque appearance on abdominal radiography, think of CHIPES: Chloral hydrate, Heavy metals, Iodides, Phenothiazines, Enteric-coated or sustained-release substances, and Solvents. [22]

Decontaminationtoggle arrow icon

Consider decontamination early to prevent further toxicity of certain substances, as the window of opportunity for life-saving benefits is often narrow. [2][13]

Body surface decontamination

The removal of any residual toxin from the patient's skin and mucus membranes to:

  • Prevent further transdermal and/or inhalational exposure
  • Protect healthcare providers from contamination

Clinical applications

Consider in any case of known or suspected exposure to chemical, biological, radiologic, or nuclear (CBRN) hazards.

Body surface decontamination is unnecessary for patients who have been exposed to radiation but have no radioactive materials on their person.

Preparation

  • Perform decontamination of dermal or ocular exposures during the 'Exposure' phase of the ABCDE approach.
  • Use the appropriate level of PPE protection; See “Tips & links” for the OHSA/EPA categories (e.g., Level A, B, or C). [25][26]
  • Consider more aggressive body surface decontamination and specialized PPE for high-risk poisons, e.g,:
    • Deliberately released poisons, e.g., nerve agents, bioterrorism
    • Household, industrial, or agricultural exposure, e.g., cleaning products, solvents, insecticide, radioactive materials in a laboratory
  • Activate necessary protocols (e.g., for hazardous exposures, mass casualties).
  • Notify external agencies according to hospital and state requirements (e.g., fire department, health department, CDC).

Use universal precautions as minimum protection when performing body surface decontamination.

Procedure [23][27]

Decontaminate the patient prior to entering patient care areas

  • Carefully and completely remove all clothing.
  • Double-bag clothing in sealed and labeled biohazard bags.
  • Wash exposed areas with copious amounts of water (and soap, if possible) for 10–15 minutes, while sponging areas gently.
    • Wash any exposed open wounds and eyes (if exposed) first.
    • Continue to wash the rest of the body, working from head to toe.
    • Prevent water runoff from touching eyes, nose, mouth, or any unexposed areas.
    • After the initial wash of eyes and/or open wounds, use water or saline to irrigate them for another 5–10 minutes.
  • In situations of deliberate release, the “rinse-wipe-rinse” approach is recommended. [28][29]

Gastrointestinal decontamination [2][4][13][14]

  • The removal of a toxic substance from the body before complete absorption by the GI tract
  • Not routinely recommended; consider individual risks and benefits in consultation with a specialist. [30][31][32]

The use of ipecac to induce vomiting is no longer recommended. [33]

Single-dose activated charcoal (AC) [2][4][13]

  • Method: oral or nasogastric administration of activated charcoal [2][30]
  • Clinical applications
    • Most effective for single toxic ingestions occurring ≤ 1 hour prior to presentation
    • Consider for single ingestions of slowly metabolized substances occurring > 1 hour from presentation, such as: [13]
      • Substances that prolong GI transit (e.g., TCAs)
      • Extended-release formulations
  • Contraindications

Single-dose AC can include vomiting and/or constipation. Coadministration of cathartics (e.g., sorbitol) is discouraged.

Activated charcoal does not adsorb metals (e.g., iron, mercury, arsenic, lead, lithium), alcohols (e.g., ethanol, methanol, ethylene glycol), organic solvents (e.g., acetone), acids, bases, or cyanides. [12][34]

Whole bowel irrigation (WBI) [2][4][13]

WBI may cause vomiting and bowel distention, leading to aspiration.

Gastric lavage [2][4][13]

Gastric lavage should only be performed by experienced individuals in consultation with a toxicologist in rare situations where the benefits outweigh the risks. [4]

Enhanced eliminationtoggle arrow icon

General principles [2][4][12][13]

  • The removal of a toxic substance from the body after absorption by the GI tract
  • Indicated for a small number of substances with specific pharmacokinetics .

Consult a toxicologist or poison control unit before implementing enhanced elimination methods. [13][14]

Multidose activated charcoal (MDAC) [2][4][12][13]

Avoid coadministration of MDAC with cathartics (e.g., sorbitol). [2][35]

Urine alkalinization [2][4][12][13]

Maintain normokalemia for urinary alkalinization to be successful.

Extracorporeal therapy (ECTR) [2][4][12][13]

Consult nephrology and toxicology before administering ECTR. Central line insertion is typically required.

Antidotestoggle arrow icon

Definition [12][37][38][39]

  • A therapy that counteracts or reduces the effects of a toxic substance, by any of the following:
    • Directly neutralizing the substance
    • Interfering with receptors or downstream chemical pathways that cause toxicity
    • Preventing the formation of toxic metabolites
  • Antidotes can also restrict absorption and enhance elimination of the substance.

Antidotes are most useful for substances that have delayed, potentially life-threatening consequences (e.g., N-acetylcysteine for acetaminophen overdose).

Administration [12][38][39]

Consult poison control before administering antidotes, unless treatment is time-sensitive and potentially life-saving (e.g., naloxone, atropine, 8.4% NaHCO3).

Risks [12][38][39]

  • Risks of rare use
    • May not be immediately available [14]
    • High risk of dosing errors
  • Risks are greater in patients with critical illness, coingestions, and specific comorbidities. [12][12][38]
  • High-quality evidence to support the use of most antidotes is limited.

Consult poison control (e.g., by calling 1-800-222-1222 in the US) to determine the risks and benefits of an antidote for an individual poisoning.

Overview of common antidotes

Overview of antidotes, reversal agents, and enhanced elimination therapy [4][12][38]
Antidotes and/or enhanced elimination agents Management
Benzodiazepines Flumazenil (rarely indicated) See “Benzodiazepine overdose.”
Barbiturates Sodium bicarbonate (enhanced elimination) See “Barbiturate overdose.”
Opioids Naloxone See “Management of opioid overdose.”

Organophosphate pesticides and nerve agents

Atropine and pralidoxime See “Cholinergic poisoning.”
Anticholinergics Physostigmine (rarely indicated) See “Anticholinergic poisoning.”
Serotonergic agents Cyproheptadine (rarely indicated) See “Management of serotonin syndrome.”
Stimulants Benzodiazepines for stimulant intoxication See “Management of stimulant intoxication.”
Acetaminophen N-acetylcysteine See “Management of acetaminophen overdose.”
Salicylates Sodium bicarbonate (enhanced elimination) See “Management of salicylate poisoning.”
Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) Sodium bicarbonate See “Approach to antidepressant overdose” and “TCA overdose.”
Beta blockers High-dose glucagon, high-dose euglycemic insulin See “Initial management of CV drug poisoning,” “Beta blocker poisoning,” “CCB poisoning,” and “Digoxin poisoning.”
Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) Calcium for drug poisoning, high-dose euglycemic insulin
Digoxin Digoxin immune Fab
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) Dantrolene, bromocriptine (rarely indicated) See “Management of NMS.”
Malignant hyperthermia Dantrolene See “Management of malignant hyperthermia.”
Heparin Protamine sulfate See “Heparin reversal.”
Warfarin Vitamin K, PCC or fresh frozen plasma See “Warfarin reversal.”
DOACs Idarucizumab for dabigatran; andexanet alfa for factor Xa inhibitors See “DOAC reversal.”
Local anesthetics Intravenous lipid emulsion therapy See “Local anesthetic systemic toxicity” and “LAST-induced cardiac arrest.”
Cyanide Hydroxocobalamin, sodium nitrite, sodium thiosulfate See “Cyanide poisoning.”

Ethylene glycol

Fomepizole See “Toxic alcohol poisoning.”
Methanol
Iron Deferoxamine See “Metal toxicity.”
Lead or mercury Succimer
Arsenic Dimercaprol
Carbon monoxide Supplemental oxygen, hyperbaric oxygen therapy See “Management of carbon monoxide poisoning.”
Methemoglobinemia Methylene blue See “Management of methemoglobinemia.”
Atropa belladonna Physostigmine (limited availability in US) See “Plant poisoning.”
Amanita phalloides N-acetylcysteine, penicillin G, silibinin See “Mushrooms poisoning.”

Supportive caretoggle arrow icon

Aggressive supportive care is essential to the successful management of poisoned patients, irrespective of the need for other interventions (e.g., decontamination, antidotes).

Systems-based supportive care

Cardiorespiratory [5][13]

Metabolic [5][13][40]

Temperature (hyperthermia) [5][13]

Many cases of poisoning can be effectively managed with supportive care alone. [2]

Consider 3% hypertonic saline to treat severe MDMA-induced hyponatremia causing cerebral edema or seizures.

Toxic substances without specific antidotes

Management of the following poisonings typically involves aggressive supportive care until the toxin is cleared endogenously or via enhanced elimination:

Monitoringtoggle arrow icon

Monitoring parameters [2]

Clinical and diagnostic monitoring are often required. Discuss details with poison control based on the toxicological risk assessment.

Duration of observation [2]

  • Consider short duration (e.g., 6 hours) for intentional ingestion, if:
    • Peak toxicity is expected to be reached within that time
    • Overall level of toxicity is predicted to be low
    • Patient remains asymptomatic
    • Patient has received a psychiatric consult
  • Consider long duration (e.g., > 24 hours) in the following situations:
    • Substance-related: extended-release formulation, delayed peak effects , delayed toxicity , or active metabolites . [39]
    • Patient-related: Symptoms do not resolve with supportive treatment or complications occur.

Choose a monitoring interval that takes altered pharmacokinetics into account. In many cases, a substance's reported elimination half-life at therapeutic levels differs from that of overdose.

Dispositiontoggle arrow icon

Discuss disposition with a toxicologist or poison control center based on individual toxicological risk assessment. Most patients require admission for stabilization, treatment, observation, and/or involuntary commitment.

Consult critical care early for all unstable patients or those with a high-risk toxicological risk assessment.

Acute management checklisttoggle arrow icon

Internally concealed controlled substancestoggle arrow icon

Definitions [41][42][43]

  • Body packing: intentional or coerced ingestion of large quantities of a controlled substance (e.g., narcotics, cocaine, amphetamines) in packaging that prevents absorption, typically for smuggling purposes
  • Body stuffing: ingestion or intracavitary concealment of small amounts of drugs to avoid arrest

A patient's concealment of drugs, involvement with drug trafficking, or lack of cooperation with health providers may be involuntary. Beware of implicit biases during the clinical encounter.

Clinical features [41][42][43]

Clinical manifestations, e.g., opioid toxidrome, sympathomimetic toxidrome, depend on the substance and amount absorbed.

Diagnostics [41][42][43]

Body stuffing is a clinical diagnosis. Obtain confirmatory imaging if body packing is suspected.

  • Abdominal x-ray
    • Indicated as a screening tool or for rapid confirmation
    • Reported sensitivity ranges from 40 to 90% [44]
  • CT abdomen: indicated if x-ray findings are equivocal

Management [41][42][43]

A ruptured packet in a patient with body packing is an acute life-threatening emergency. It often requires respiratory support, hemodynamic stabilization, large quantities of antidotes, and/or surgical intervention.

Referencestoggle arrow icon

  1. Thompson TM, Theobald J, Lu J, Erickson TB. The general approach to the poisoned patient. Dis Mon. 2014; 60 (11): p.509-524.doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2014.10.002 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  2. Walls R, Hockberger R, Gausche-Hill M. Rosen's Emergency Medicine. Elsevier Health Sciences ; 2018
  3. Frithsen IL, Simpson WM Jr. Recognition and management of acute medication poisoning.. Am Fam Physician. 2010; 81 (3): p.316-23.
  4. Coulson JM, Thompson JP. Investigation and management of the poisoned patient. Clin Med (Northfield Il). 2008; 8 (1): p.89-91.doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.8-1-89 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  5. Hoffman RS, Burns MM, Gosselin S. Ingestion of Caustic Substances. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382 (18): p.1739-1748.doi: 10.1056/nejmra1810769 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  6. Walker PF, Buehner MF, Wood LA, et al. Diagnosis and management of inhalation injury: an updated review. Crit Care. 2015; 19 (1).doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1077-4 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  7. Traub SJ, Wijdicks EF. Initial Diagnosis and Management of Coma. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2016; 34 (4): p.777-793.doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2016.06.017 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  8. Dietze P, Horyniak D, Agius P, et al. Effect of Intubation for Gamma‐hydroxybutyric Acid Overdose on Emergency Department Length of Stay and Hospital Admission. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2014; 21 (11): p.1226-1231.doi: 10.1111/acem.12516 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  9. Delk C, Holstege CP, Brady WJ. Electrocardiographic abnormalities associated with poisoning. Am J Emerg Med. 2007; 25 (6): p.672-687.doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.11.038 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  10. Mégarbane B. Toxidrome-based Approach to Common Poisonings. Asia Pacific Journal of Medical Toxicology. 2014; 3 (1): p.2-12.doi: 10.22038/apjmt.2014.2463 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  11. Morrison EE, Sandilands EA. Principles of management of the poisoned patient. Medicine. 2020; 48 (3): p.160-164.doi: 10.1016/j.mpmed.2019.12.003 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  12. Greene SL. Acute poisoning: understanding 90% of cases in a nutshell. Postgrad Med J. 2005; 81 (954): p.204-216.doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.024794 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  13. Daly FFS. A risk assessment based approach to the management of acute poisoning. Emerg Med J. 2006; 23 (5): p.396-399.doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.030312 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  14. Bauer M. Cardiovascular Anatomy and Pharmacology. Basic Sciences in Anesthesia. 2017: p.195-228.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-62067-1_11 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  15. Hoffman RS, Goldfrank LR. The poisoned patient with altered consciousness. Controversies in the use of a 'coma cocktail'.. JAMA. 1995; 274 (7): p.562-9.
  16. Rzasa Lynn R, Galinkin J. Naloxone dosage for opioid reversal: current evidence and clinical implications. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety. 2017; 9 (1): p.63-88.doi: 10.1177/2042098617744161 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  17. Chen H-Y, Albertson TE, Olson KR. Treatment of drug-induced seizures. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 81 (3): p.412-419.doi: 10.1111/bcp.12720 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  18. Ten Things Physicians and Patients Should Question. https://www.choosingwisely.org/societies/american-college-of-medical-toxicology-and-the-american-academy-of-clinical-toxicology/. Updated: March 6, 2015. Accessed: March 19, 2021.
  19. Thanacoody R. Principles of assessment and diagnosis of the poisoned patient. Medicine. 2020; 48 (3): p.156-159.doi: 10.1016/j.mpmed.2019.12.002 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  20. Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, Cisek J. Emergency Department Hazardous Materials Protocol for Contaminated Patients. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 34 (2): p.205-212.doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70230-1 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  21. Waddy S. Management of the poisoned patient. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2007; 8 (11): p.474-476.doi: 10.1016/j.mpaic.2007.08.020 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  22. CBRN Personal Protective Equipment Selection Matrix for Emergency Responders. https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/emergencypreparedness/cbrnmatrix/index.html. Updated: April 1, 2005. Accessed: May 12, 2021.
  23. Chemical Hazards Emergency Medical Management. https://chemm.nlm.nih.gov/ppe.htm. Updated: March 8, 2021. Accessed: May 12, 2021.
  24. Volume III - Medical Management Guidelines (MMGs). https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/MHMI/index.html#bookmark07. Updated: January 1, 2001. Accessed: May 14, 2021.
  25. Initial clinical management of patients exposed to chemical weapons. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/initial-clinical-management-of-patients-exposed-to-chemical-weapons-interim-guidance-document. Updated: January 10, 2014. Accessed: May 12, 2021.
  26. McGlone MM, Teece SC. Management of the poisoned patient. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2016; 17 (10): p.506-509.doi: 10.1016/j.mpaic.2016.07.004 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  27. Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, Vale JA, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology., European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists.. Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal.. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005; 43 (2): p.61-87.doi: 10.1081/clt-200051867 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  28. Thanacoody R, Caravati EM, Troutman B, et al. Position paper update: Whole bowel irrigation for gastrointestinal decontamination of overdose patients. Clin Toxicol. 2014; 53 (1): p.5-12.doi: 10.3109/15563650.2014.989326 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  29. Benson BE, Hoppu K, Troutman WG, et al. Position paper update: gastric lavage for gastrointestinal decontamination. Clin Toxicol. 2013; 51 (3): p.140-146.doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.770154 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  30. Höjer J, Troutman WG, Hoppu K, et al. Position paper update: ipecac syrup for gastrointestinal decontamination. Clin Toxicol. 2013; 51 (3): p.134-139.doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.770153 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  31. Zellner T, Prasa D, Färber E, Hoffmann-Walbeck P, Genser D, Eyer F. The Use of Activated Charcoal to Treat Intoxications.. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019; 116 (18): p.311-317.doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0311 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  32. Kobylarz D, Noga M, Frydrych A, et al. Antidotes in Clinical Toxicology - Critical Review. Toxics. 2023; 11 (9): p.723.doi: 10.3390/toxics11090723 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  33. Smollin CG. Toxicology: Pearls and Pitfalls in the Use of Antidotes. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010; 28 (1): p.149-161.doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2009.09.009 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  34. Buckley NA, Dawson AH, Juurlink DN, Isbister GK. Who gets antidotes? choosing the chosen few. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016; 81 (3): p.402-407.doi: 10.1111/bcp.12894 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  35. Klein-Schwartz W, Stassinos GL, Isbister GK. Treatment of sulfonylurea and insulin overdose. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016; 81 (3): p.496-504.doi: 10.1111/bcp.12822 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  36. Vale JA, Krenzelok EP, Barceloux GD. Position statement and practice guidelines on the use of multi-dose activated charcoal in the treatment of acute poisoning.. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1999; 37 (6): p.731-51.doi: 10.1081/clt-100102451 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  37. Proudfoot AT, Krenzelok EP, Vale JA. Position Paper on Urine Alkalinization. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004; 42 (1): p.1-26.doi: 10.1081/clt-120028740 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  38. $Contributor Disclosures - Approach to the poisoned patient. None of the individuals in control of the content for this article reported relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies. For details, please review our full conflict of interest (COI) policy:.
  39. Walls R, Hockberger R, Gausche-Hill M, Erickson TB, Wilcox SR. Rosen's Emergency Medicine 10th edition- Concepts and Clinical Practice E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences ; 2022
  40. Traub SJ, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS. Body Packing — The Internal Concealment of Illicit Drugs. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349 (26): p.2519-2526.doi: 10.1056/nejmra022719 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  41. Heymann-Maier L, Trueb L, Schmidt S, et al. Emergency department management of body packers and body stuffers. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017.doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14499 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  42. Reginelli A, Russo A, Urraro F, et al. Imaging of body packing: errors and medico-legal issues. Abdom Imaging. 2015; 40 (7): p.2127-2142.doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0469-x . | Open in Read by QxMD
  43. Murphy L, Wolfer H, Hendrickson RG. Toxicologic Confounders of Brain Death Determination: A Narrative Review.. Neurocrit Care. 2020.doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01114-y . | Open in Read by QxMD
  44. Hunter TB, Taljanovic MS. Foreign Bodies. Radiographics. 2003; 23 (3): p.731-757.doi: 10.1148/rg.233025137 . | Open in Read by QxMD
Sign up and get unlimited access.
disclaimer Evidence-based content, created and peer-reviewed by physicians. Read the disclaimer