ambossIconambossIcon

Abnormal labor and delivery

Last updated: September 24, 2024

Summarytoggle arrow icon

Labor and delivery can be complicated by multiple factors: prolonged stages of labor can lead to active-phase labor arrest, obstructed labor can occur due to mechanical reasons (e.g., fetal malpresentation), abnormal rupture of membranes can increase the risk of chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis, and umbilical cord complications can increase the risk of birth asphyxia and stillbirth. Management of these complications is typically tailored to the individual and can include induction of labor, prophylaxis for neonatal GBS infection, assisted vaginal delivery, special obstetrical maneuvers, intrauterine resuscitation measures, and emergency cesarean delivery.

See also “Normal labor and delivery,” “Preterm labor,” “Postpartum hemorrhage,” “Chorioamnionitis,” and “Birth traumas.”

Abnormalities in fetal orientationtoggle arrow icon

Fetal malpresentation and fetal malposition are associated with increased perinatal risks and may require assisted delivery or cesarean delivery to prevent maternal and fetal complications (see “Obstructed labor”).

Fetal malpresentation

Fetal malposition

Prolonged stages of labortoggle arrow icon

Etiology

  • Abnormalities of the 3 P's of labor
    • Pelvis: size and shape of the maternal pelvis (e.g., small bony pelvis)
    • Passenger: size and position of the infant (e.g., fetal macrosomia or abnormal orientation)
    • Power: strength and frequency of contractions (e.g., dysfunctional contractions )

Abnormal labor stages

Overview
Stage Characteristics Duration Management
Nulliparous patients Multiparous patients
First stage of labor Prolonged latent phase
  • > 20 hours
  • > 14 hours
Prolonged active phase
Arrested active phase
  • ≥ 6 cm cervical dilation with ruptured membranes and no cervical change after one of the following:
    • ≥ 4 hours of adequate contractions (≥ 200 Montevideo units)
    • > 6 hours of inadequate contractions
  • Usually due to abnormalities of the 3 P's of labor
Prolonged second stage of labor
  • > 3 hours (> 4 hours in patients who received an epidural)
  • > 2 hours (> 3 hours in patients who received an epidural)
Prolonged third stage of labor [1]

Complications of a prolonged second stage are postpartum hemorrhage and a poor neonatal outcome.

If the placenta is incomplete or if an accessory placenta is suspected, manual palpation should be performed and any remaining tissue should be removed by curettage.

Obstructed labortoggle arrow icon

Definition [2]

  • The arrest of vaginal delivery as a result of a mechanical obstruction

Risk factors

Clinical features [3][4]

Maternal

Fetal

Prelabor management

Patients with an increased risk for obstructed labor should create a birth plan with their obstetrician, possibly including a scheduled cesarean delivery.

Primary cesarean delivery may be chosen for patients at high risk of obstructed labor (e.g., due to congenital fetal anomalies or maternal risk factors). [9]

External cephalic version [8]

Active labor management [11]

Approach

Transabdominal ultrasound is more accurate than digital cervical examination for determining fetal head position. [12]

Fetal presentation-based management

Complications [3][16]

Fetal

Maternal

Shoulder dystociatoggle arrow icon

Definition [17]

  • An obstetric emergency in which the anterior shoulder of the fetus becomes impacted behind the maternal pubic symphysis during vaginal delivery, or, less commonly, the posterior shoulder becomes impacted against the sacral promontory

Epidemiology

Risk factors [17]

Always be prepared for shoulder dystocia, as it can occur even in the absence of risk factors. [17]

Clinical features

  • Inability to deliver either shoulder with gentle downward traction on the fetal head
  • Turtle sign: retraction of the partially delivered fetal head against the perineum
  • Failed restitution of the fetal head

Management

For general management of vaginal delivery, see “Manually assisted vaginal delivery.”

Approach [11][17][18]

Shoulder dystocia maneuvers [11][15][19]

  • Initial maneuvers
    • McRoberts maneuver
      • The patient should stop bearing down and lie supine with the buttocks on the edge of the bed.
      • Abduct, externally rotate, and hyperflex the maternal hips (with the maternal legs pulled towards the head).
    • McRoberts maneuver with suprapubic pressure (Rubin I maneuver) [17]
    • Manual delivery of the posterior fetal arm
  • Secondary maneuvers
    • Rubin II maneuver: Manually rotate the fetal shoulder girdle by applying pressure to the posterior part of the anterior shoulder.
    • Woods corkscrew maneuver: Manually rotate the fetal shoulder girdle by applying pressure to the anterior part of the posterior shoulder.
    • Gaskin maneuver (all fours positions)
      • The patient moves into hands and knees position.
      • Rubin and Woods maneuvers can be repeated.
  • Maneuvers of last resort

Internal maneuvers (i.e., maneuvers requiring direct manipulation of fetal parts) may require episiotomy and can be performed together with the McRoberts maneuver. [19]

Avoid excessive downward or lateral traction on the fetal head and neck, as this can result in brachial plexus injuries. [18]

Complications [18]

Abnormal rupture of membranestoggle arrow icon

Definitions [21]

Epidemiology [21]

The following values pertain to patients in the US:

Risk factors for PPROM [21][23]

Risk factors for PPROM are similar to risk factors for preterm labor, e.g.:

Diagnostics for abnormal rupture of membranes [21]

Do not perform a digital cervical examination unless the patient is in active labor because it increases the risk of infection and has minimal diagnostic utility. [21]

Management [21][23]

Initial management

Management by gestational age

PPROM antibiotic prophylaxis

Complications [21][23]

Umbilical cord complicationstoggle arrow icon

Umbilical cord presentation [26]

Umbilical cord prolapse [11][26]

Definitions

Epidemiology

Etiology

Diagnostics

Management

Minimize manipulation of the prolapsed cord, as this can cause vasospasm and fetal hypoxia.

Nuchal cord [11][28]

Knotting of the umbilical cord

Induction of labortoggle arrow icon

Indications for induction of labor

Contraindications for induction of labor [32]

Bishop score [32]

Overview

Bishop score

Bishop score [32]
Score
0 points 1 point 2 points 3 points
Cervical position Posterior Midline Anterior
Cervical consistency Firm Moderately firm Soft (ripe)
Cervical effacement ≤ 30% 31–50% 51–80% > 80%
Cervical dilation Closed 1–2 cm 3–4 cm ≥ 5 cm
Fetal station -3 cm -2 cm -1/0 cm +1/+2 cm

Approach

Assisted vaginal deliverytoggle arrow icon

Obstetric forceps delivery [34]

Vacuum extractor delivery [34]

A routine episiotomy is not recommended with assisted vaginal delivery because of the risk of poor healing and anal sphincter injury!

An advantage of assisted vaginal delivery is avoiding cesarean delivery.

Intrauterine resuscitationtoggle arrow icon

Intrauterine resuscitation focuses on improving oxygen delivery to the placenta and maintaining umbilical blood flow to treat fetal distress and enable safe delivery.

Use IV fluids with caution in patients with cardiomyopathy or preeclampsia, as these patients have an increased risk of hypervolemia, which can lead to pulmonary edema. [35]

Episiotomytoggle arrow icon

  • Consists of an incision of the perineum (midline or mediolateral) to enlarge the vaginal opening during delivery
  • No longer routinely recommended.
  • Can be considered if vaginal delivery needs to be expedited and maternal perineal tissue is thought to pose a significant obstacle, e.g.:

Referencestoggle arrow icon

  1. Garite TJ, Simpson KR. Intrauterine Resuscitation During Labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 54 (1): p.28-39.doi: 10.1097/grf.0b013e31820a062b . | Open in Read by QxMD
  2. Simpson KR, James DC. Efficacy of Intrauterine Resuscitation Techniques in Improving Fetal Oxygen Status During Labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105 (6): p.1362-1368.doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000164474.03350.7c . | Open in Read by QxMD
  3. Abati I, Micaglio M, Giugni D, Seravalli V, Vannucci G, Di Tommaso M. Maternal Oxygen Administration during Labor: A Controversial Practice. Children. 2023; 10 (8): p.1420.doi: 10.3390/children10081420 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  4. Mahfouz A, Monaghan S, Zacharzewski A. Intrauterine fetal resuscitation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2022; 23 (6): p.336-340.doi: 10.1016/j.mpaic.2022.02.024 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  5. Hofmeyr GJ, Lawrie TA. Amnioinfusion for potential or suspected umbilical cord compression in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012.doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd000013.pub2 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  6. Pavličev M, Romero R, Mitteroecker P. Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222 (1): p.3-16.doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.043 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  7. Neilson J, Lavender T, Quenby S, Wray S. Obstructed labour. Br Med Bull. 2003; 67 (1): p.191-204.doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldg018 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  8. Ayenew AA. Incidence, causes, and maternofetal outcomes of obstructed labor in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health. 2021; 18 (1).doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01103-0 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 745: Mode of Term Singleton Breech Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132 (2): p.e60-e63.doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002755 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  10. Carbillon L, Benbara A, Tigaizin A, et al. Revisiting the management of term breech presentation: a proposal for overcoming some of the controversies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20 (1).doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2831-4 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  11. Oyinloye OI, Okoyomo AA. Longitudinal evaluation of foetal transverse lie using ultrasonography. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010; 14 (1): p.129-33.
  12. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. External Cephalic Version: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 221. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135 (5): p.e203-e212.doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003837 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  13. Boyle A, Reddy UM, Landy HJ, Huang CC, Driggers RW, Laughon SK. Primary Cesarean Delivery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122 (1): p.33-40.doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182952242 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  14. Rosman AN, Guijt A, Vlemmix F, Rijnders M, Mol BWJ, Kok M. Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 92 (2): p.137-142.doi: 10.1111/aogs.12011 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  15. Walls R, Hockberger R, Gausche-Hill M, Erickson TB, Wilcox SR. Rosen's Emergency Medicine 10th edition- Concepts and Clinical Practice E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences ; 2022
  16. Haumonte JB, Blanc J, Castel P, et al. Uncertain fetal head engagement: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing digital exam with angle of progression. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022.doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.018 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  17. Sharshiner R, Silver RM. Management of Fetal Malpresentation. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 58 (2): p.246-255.doi: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000103 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  18. Barth WH. Persistent Occiput Posterior. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125 (3): p.695-709.doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000647 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  19. Roberts JR. Roberts and Hedges' Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine and Acute Care. Elsevier ; 2018
  20. Van Beekhuizen HJ, Unkels R, Mmuni NS, Kaiser M. Complications of obstructed labour: pressure necrosis of neonatal scalp and vesicovaginal fistula. The Lancet. 2006; 368 (9542): p.1210.doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69477-4 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  21. Pagan M, Eads L, Sward L, Manning N, Hunzicker A, Magann EF. Umbilical Cord Prolapse: A Review of the Literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2020; 75 (8): p.510-518.doi: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000000818 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  22. Sayed Ahmed W, Hamdy M. Optimal management of umbilical cord prolapse. Int J Womens Health. 2018; Volume 10: p.459-465.doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s130879 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  23. Peesay M. Nuchal cord and its implications. Matern Health Neonatol and Perinatol. 2017; 3 (1).doi: 10.1186/s40748-017-0068-7 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  24. Hayes DJL, Warland J, Parast MM, et al. Umbilical cord characteristics and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15 (9): p.e0239630.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239630 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  25. Carter EB, Chu CS, Thompson Z, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Cahill AG. True knot at the time of delivery: electronic fetal monitoring characteristics and neonatal outcomes. J Perinatol. 2018; 38 (12): p.1620-1624.doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0250-4 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  26. Gokmen Karasu AF, Kutuk MS. Prenatal detection and obstetric management of true umbilical cord knots using color Doppler and 4D ultrasonography: a report of two cases and literature review. Case Rep Perinat Med. 2018; 8 (1).doi: 10.1515/crpm-2017-0061 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  27. Patterson DA, Winslow M, Matus CD. Spontaneous vaginal delivery. Am Fam Physician. 2008; 78 (3): p.336-41.
  28. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 217. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135 (3): p.e80-e97.doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003700 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  29. Al-lawama M, AlZaatreh A, Elrajabi R, Abdelhamid S, Badran E. Prolonged Rupture of Membranes, Neonatal Outcomes and Management Guidelines. J Clin Med Res. 2019; 11 (5): p.360-366.doi: 10.14740/jocmr3809 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  30. Medina TM, Hill DA. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2006; 73 (4): p.659-64.
  31. ACOG. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133 (2): p.e164-e173.doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003074 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  32. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No 652: Magnesium Sulfate Use in Obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127 (1): p.e52-e53.
  33. Dutta DC, Konar H. Textbook of Obstetrics. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers ; 2015
  34. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of Labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114 (2): p.386-397.doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181b48ef5 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  35. Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, Sun L, Reddy UM. Using a Simplified Bishop Score to Predict Vaginal Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117 (4): p.805-811.doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182114ad2 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  36. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No 178: Shoulder Dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129 (5): p.e123-e133.doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002043 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  37. Hill DA, Lense J, Roepcke F. Shoulder Dystocia: Managing an Obstetric Emergency. Am Fam Physician. 2020; 102 (2): p.84-90.
  38. Lau SL, Sin WTA, Wong L, Lee NMW, Hui SYA, Leung TY. A critical evaluation of the external and internal maneuvers for resolution of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023.doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.016 . | Open in Read by QxMD
  39. Raducha JE, Cohen B, Blood T, Katarincic J. A Review of Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy: Injury and Rehabilitation. R I Med J (2013). 2017; 100 (11): p.17-21.
Sign up and get unlimited access.
disclaimer Evidence-based content, created and peer-reviewed by physicians. Read the disclaimer